Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Cyber shade |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has an overall score of 77.5, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is an incredibly older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but Xiaomi managed to build it incredibly thinner and just a bit lighter. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little greater pixel number per screen inch, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a way larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a way better video definition and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 5300mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.