Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, with an 85.5 score against 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a much newer and somewhat lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, although it is also a little thicker. Galaxy A51 has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
Galaxy A51 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A51 counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.