Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a general score of 90.7 against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy A52's body is noticeably newer and lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, although it is also a bit thicker. Galaxy A52 features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels per display inch, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A52 takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a much higher resolution camera in the back, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 18% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.