Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's overall score of 77.5. Although Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, it's lighter and also extremely newer. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit greater screen pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A52 5G features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs, a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.