Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 344 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having an 88.1 score against 77.5. The Galaxy F62 construction is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, although it's thicker and just a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little higher pixels density, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy F62 features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 has superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a 32 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a way bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.