Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, with a overall score of 97.6 against 77.5. The Galaxy Fold body is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM.
Galaxy Fold features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a better 1536 x 2152 resolution, a quite larger display and a bit higher pixel count per inch of screen. The Galaxy Fold captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger sensor, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a much bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Xiaomi Mi Max 2, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.