Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, with a score of 98.9 against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a little thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a greater display pixels density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.