Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a 77.7 score against 77.5. The Galaxy Note3 is an extremely older and just a little bit thicker phone than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but Samsung made it incredibly lighter anyway. Galaxy Note3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a quite greater screen density.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a bit better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher number of cores and 1 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5300mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note3's camera is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 one, because although the Galaxy Note3 has a smaller camera sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have a F2.2 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, it also counts with a camera in the back with more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.