Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-01 | -- |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 7.44 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's global score of 77.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and notably thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a higher pixels density, a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 6% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way better 200 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.