Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 344 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's score of 77.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is incredibly newer than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, it's heavier and way thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels quantity per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. They have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 18% larger battery size. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images and a much tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also counts with a much better (4K) video quality.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.