Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 344 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, with an 81 score against 77.5. Galaxy XCover Pro's body is newer, but a little heavier and extremely thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a lot tinier sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels and a much larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.