Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's score of 77.5. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is incredibly newer, just a little thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a little higher pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, they both have a 12 MP back facing camera. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a much better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.