Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a 92.3 score against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is extremely newer, a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a bit better pixel density, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5300mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video quality and a 12 mega pixels camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.