Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 295.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, getting a 90.6 score against 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is much newer and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, although it is incredibly heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a higher 1768 x 2208px resolution, a just a bit better screen density and a larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both have a same size camera aperture and a same resolution camera in the back. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.