Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's 74.9 score. Even when iPhone X and the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 were released with only a couple of months difference, iPhone X is extremely lighter and just a little thinner. IPhone X has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a better quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Apple iPhone X features a quite superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has less processing cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone X counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 103% bigger battery size. Apple iPhone X features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a larger aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.