Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 15 |
| 2018-07-19 | -- |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, having a general score of 76.7 against 74.9. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s body is extremely thinner and notably lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has an older 15 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a much better looking display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has higher 60 fps video frame rates and a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity instead of 4650mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.