Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, having an 87.5 score against 74.9. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is newer and notably lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's, but it is also just a bit thicker.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor and the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low-light environments, faster video frame rates and a more MP camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.