Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's score of 74.9. The LG Velvet is a lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, but both have the same thickness. LG Velvet counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The LG Velvet features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG Velvet counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG Velvet has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.