Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, with an 86.3 score against 74.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is noticeably newer and somewhat lighter, but just a little thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs, a way bigger aperture to capture better low light images and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with improved battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5500mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.