Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's 74.9 general score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is notably newer and lighter, but also just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot larger back camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 22 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.