Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, having a 76.2 score against 74.9. Even though the nubia Red Magic 5S is somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, it's a little lighter and also incredibly newer. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has older 10 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better video resolution, a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features improved battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.