Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's 74.9 general score. The Galaxy A25 5G construction is way newer and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's, although it is a bit thicker. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy A25 5G has a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels quantity in each inch of display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.