Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-07-19 | -- |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a score of 82.9, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's global score of 74.9. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A34 has older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a a lot thinner and way lighter device than Xiaomi Mi Max 3.
Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB.
The Galaxy A34 features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A34, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A34 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.