Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, with a general score of 79.4 against 74.9. Galaxy A35 5G is a newer and a bit lighter device than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, although it is also a little bit thicker. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy A35 5G has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A35 5G features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more MP, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.