Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, getting a global score of 83.8 against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a a little thinner and lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, even when they were released only 8 months apart. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a lot higher 25 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Galaxy A50 features much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 38 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.