Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-19 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, with a global score of 86.6 against 74.9. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Galaxy A50s's design is newer, a little bit thinner and notably lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A50s features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite greater screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A50s captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Galaxy A50s has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.