Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's score of 74.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, it's lighter and also newer. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.