Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, with a global score of 90.7 against 74.9. Although the Galaxy A52 is a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, it's somewhat lighter and also newer. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 features a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a much more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.