Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's overall score of 74.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a incredibly newer and somewhat lighter device than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, but it is also a bit thicker.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel quantity per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.