Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's 74.9 overall score. The Galaxy A70 construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, but it's somewhat lighter. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy A70 features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A70 features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 also counts with a bigger sensor. Galaxy A70 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features improved battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.