Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's 74.9 score. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo, giving you lots of additional features. Galaxy Fold's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Mi Max 3.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a just a little greater pixel density, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1536 x 2152.
Samsung Galaxy Fold captures slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels, a 0.39 inches back camera sensor and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.