Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3's global score of 74.9. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a lot newer and a little bit lighter device than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, but it is just a little bit thicker. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a lot better video definition, a bigger aperture and a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.