Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, with a global score of 93.6 against 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, but it is lighter. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy S10 5G features a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a much larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and better video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.