Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, having a 98 score against 74.9. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is newer, but thicker and a little heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a little better battery duration than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.