Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-19 | -- |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, having a overall score of 82.6 against 74.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy S25 is a a lot lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Xiaomi Mi Max 3.
The Galaxy S25 features a way better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 shoots way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher video definition, a camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.