Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 350 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, with a global score of 81 against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is newer and a little lighter, but also way thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy XCover Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a back facing camera with a much higher 25 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 36% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.