Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 350 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's overall score of 74.9. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer device, and it is also just a bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 3.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, a same size sensor and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger aperture and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.