Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-19 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.94 x 3.44 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 350 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, getting a overall score of 81.1 against 74.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is newer and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max 3's, but it's also somewhat thicker. These devices work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 has a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.