Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2016-05-17 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 77.5. The Apple iPhone XS is a lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Max, but both of them are equally thin. IPhone XS counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The iPhone XS has a better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Xiaomi Mi Max features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
IPhone XS has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has an 82% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.