Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-17 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max's 77.5 global score. Even though Google Pixel 3a is just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max, it's extremely lighter and also notably newer. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2220px.
The Google Pixel 3a features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Google Pixel 3a takes slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a much less megapixels camera in the back and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Max has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4850mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.