Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-17 | -- |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 7.16 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Max, with a global score of 82.2 against 77.5. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a incredibly lighter and much thinner device than Xiaomi Mi Max. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a quite better pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a really superior processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better video frame rate and a back camera with much more MP. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.