Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| 2016-05-17 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 344 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a 77.5 score against 77. The Xiaomi Mi Max design is just a little bit thinner than the HTC U Ultra, but it is somewhat heavier and was released around 9 months before. Xiaomi Mi Max and HTC U Ultra count with really similar CPUs, and although the HTC U Ultra has less cpu cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density. HTC U Ultra captures a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
HTC U Ultra has a better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Max features a much better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.