Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-17 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, having a score of 87.1 against 77.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer and just a little bit lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi Max, but it's somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bit larger display, a bit better screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, higher video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Mi Max has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.