Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-17 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 77.5 against 75.8. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Mi Max is extremely older than nubia Red Magic 3S, it's body is incredibly thinner and a bit lighter. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a just a bit better display pixels density and a bit larger display. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way better video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.