Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-05-17 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, with a 77.8 score against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is a way newer and a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi Max, although it's just a little thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a much faster CPU than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Max has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a just a bit lower pixels density, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy A33 5G has a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A33 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi Max counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution. Galaxy A33 5G has a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a 3 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.