Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-17 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, having a general score of 85.5 against 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 design is much newer and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max's, although it is also just a bit thicker. Galaxy A51 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a quite better display pixels density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A51 has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Mi Max has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 21% more battery capacity. Galaxy A51 takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 also has a back camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.