Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-17 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi Max's overall score of 77.5. Galaxy Fold's body is notably newer and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Max's, although it is also a lot heavier. Galaxy Fold counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bit higher pixel density, a better resolution of 1536 x 2152px and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Galaxy Fold shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a way less megapixels camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Max has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.