Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-17 | -- |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 7.16 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, getting an 82.6 score against 77.5. Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and noticeably lighter device than the Xiaomi Mi Max. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S25 has an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Xiaomi Mi Max features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Mi Max also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi Max counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.