Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-17 | -- |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 7.16 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, getting a 90.7 score against 77.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is extremely lighter and a lot thinner than Xiaomi Mi Max. Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bit larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a better pixel amount per inch of display.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher video quality and a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4850mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.