Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-05-17 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 344 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, having a score of 80.1 against 77.5. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is much newer, but much heavier and a lot thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way higher screen density.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Max has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4850mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Max shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.